Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
we have personnel (basically formation) and play type to filter offense
defense we have types of coverage/blitzs for LBs and DBs as ways to filter as of now i'm wondering if there is a reason not to, or future possibility of, filtering defensive plays by formation
thx for any feedback on this
Re: defensive gameplanning filter option
by
setherick
@
2/23/2016 6:35 am
TAFIV wrote:
we have personnel (basically formation) and play type to filter offense
defense we have types of coverage/blitzs for LBs and DBs as ways to filter as of now i'm wondering if there is a reason not to, or future possibility of, filtering defensive plays by formation
thx for any feedback on this
+1 ... We were ranting in MFN-19 about not being able to create a game plan that featured personnel sets. There are two of us in that league that would love to run a heavy 46 defense in our run happy league.
Re: defensive gameplanning filter option
by
TAFIV
@
2/23/2016 7:13 am
that was my reasoning too, as for instance i want to run defenses that take advantage of my better players and their strengths
as it is now i'm having to manually go through each individual play to check what the formation is so i know what positions are used in it, and whether its a pass or run defense since you will for example VERY rarely see an effective dime formation run defense play or a 46 Heavy pass defense play (not counting blitzes)
Re: defensive gameplanning filter option
by
dei1c3
@
2/23/2016 11:31 am
+1
I'm pretty sure this has been suggested before, but I'll +1 it again because it's a really needed option.
Re: defensive gameplanning filter option
by
WarEagle
@
2/23/2016 1:35 pm
dei1c3 wrote:
+1
I'm pretty sure this has been suggested before, but I'll +1 it again because it's a really needed option.