Re: Trade updates
by
parsh
@
8/18/2016 1:54 pm
FWIW .. Since the update .. 2 trades have gone seamlessly ..
Either Im getting fleeced or the points are working LOL Just curious, do both players see the same point value? |
|
Re: Trade updates
by
murderleg
@
8/18/2016 3:33 pm
I have a 89/91 LT with a value of 2000+ (aged 25)
I have a 87/91 QB with a value of 700+ (aged 23) Am I missing something here? That QB should be worth SIGNIFICANTLY more. |
|
Re: Trade updates
by
King of Bling
@
8/18/2016 3:37 pm
murderleg wrote: I have a 89/91 LT with a value of 2000+ (aged 25) I have a 87/91 QB with a value of 700+ (aged 23) Am I missing something here? That QB should be worth SIGNIFICANTLY more. Completely agree |
|
Re: Trade updates
by
lellow2011
@
8/18/2016 3:52 pm
murderleg wrote: I have a 89/91 LT with a value of 2000+ (aged 25) I have a 87/91 QB with a value of 700+ (aged 23) Am I missing something here? That QB should be worth SIGNIFICANTLY more. QB performance is so random it's hard to totally agree, example: MFN13 - 58/58 OVR - https://mfn13.myfootballnow.com/player/137 His stats this season(8 games, team is 8-0): 165/278 for 59.4% comp, 2507 yards,15 sacks taken 21TDs/12 INTs 96.31 QBR MFN1 - 93/93 OVR - https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/9923 His stats this season(11 games, team is 9-2): 173/358 for 48.3% comp, 3079 yards, 48 sacks taken 24 TDs/18 INTs 79.59 QBR |
|
|
|
|
Re: Trade updates
by
jdavidbakr
(Site Admin)
@
8/18/2016 3:56 pm
You're right, QB value was incorrect. I'm pushing an update now.
|
|
Re: Trade updates
by
WarEagle
@
8/18/2016 4:28 pm
jdavidbakr wrote: You're right, QB value was incorrect. I'm pushing an update now. I just thought my weights were way off from the mysterious default weights. Glad to know I'm not that far off. |
|
Re: Trade updates
by
raymattison21
@
8/20/2016 12:08 pm
I was wondering if the engine takes into account the value of bonus eaten by a team. Or the fact that the following season a 4 star may have to restructure for millions more. Each change the value of the player.
Say a young first is being moved. He would have his bonus eaten by the trader. Raising his value a little cause the new team wont pay a bonus for years. Same as player on the last year of his contract, but i think an expensive restructure looming would depreciate his value a little. |
|
Re: Trade updates
by
King of Bling
@
8/20/2016 2:29 pm
raymattison21 wrote: I was wondering if the engine takes into account the value of bonus eaten by a team. Or the fact that the following season a 4 star may have to restructure for millions more. Each change the value of the player. Say a young first is being moved. He would have his bonus eaten by the trader. Raising his value a little cause the new team wont pay a bonus for years. Same as player on the last year of his contract, but i think an expensive restructure looming would depreciate his value a little. It might be too cumbersome to calculate that into the ratings, but an excellent point. Eating bonus is always a consideration I ponder when trading players. |
|
Re: Trade updates
by
dei1c3
@
8/20/2016 3:02 pm
raymattison21 wrote: I was wondering if the engine takes into account the value of bonus eaten by a team. Or the fact that the following season a 4 star may have to restructure for millions more. Each change the value of the player. Say a young first is being moved. He would have his bonus eaten by the trader. Raising his value a little cause the new team wont pay a bonus for years. Same as player on the last year of his contract, but i think an expensive restructure looming would depreciate his value a little. From earlier in this thread: jdavidbakr wrote: The trade value is only based on the player's default ratings, position, and age (using default weights) So contract (bonus or otherwise) is not considered. |
|