Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
I'm unsure of #3. Because we are talking about lawyers, I want to say 'whom', but I'm pretty sure the answer is 'who'. And yes, I can start that sentence with 'because', (and this one with 'and'...)
How did I do?
It would have been better to write "I am unsure of #3, because we are talking about lawyers. I want to say 'whom', but I'm pretty sure the answer is 'who'. And yes, I can start that sentence with 'because', (and this one with 'and'...)"
Although sentences beginning with "and," "but," "or," "because," or "plus" may be used informally, use a suggested replacement for a more formal or traditional tone. (Not that there is anything wrong with that. Not my place to judge)
I think you're right, but I deliberately started the sentences that way because it's a thread about grammar and I was taught not to start sentences with 'because' or 'and'. I thought it was rebellious, and I'm nothing if not a grammar rebel...
I think you're right, but I deliberately started the sentences that way because it's a thread about grammar and I was taught not to start sentences with 'because' or 'and'. I thought it was rebellious, and I'm nothing if not a grammar rebel...
Yo It's aight. ah'm nahh longer git stressed out 'bouthavin` ta take uh course 3 times just so ah can communicate wif peeps what 'chew trippin foo'
