I understand this but I see people switching all their RBs over to being WR also. I am assuming they are doing it to get more speed. Do you think this is a big enough benefit over the loss of weight?
Re: WR at RB
by
Infinity on Trial
@
11/14/2019 5:47 pm
Lostpike wrote:
I understand this but I see people switching all their RBs over to being WR also. I am assuming they are doing it to get more speed. Do you think this is a big enough benefit over the loss of weight?
Yes, but it's helpful to have at least one guy who can pound inside. I personally favor handing the ball to someone with 88+ speed, but there are other factors to consider.
I understand this but I see people switching all their RBs over to being WR also. I am assuming they are doing it to get more speed. Do you think this is a big enough benefit over the loss of weight?
Yes, but it's helpful to have at least one guy who can pound inside. I personally favor handing the ball to someone with 88+ speed, but there are other factors to consider.
I like light weight, speedy guys with good route running for outside runs in say the west coast offense. The rest of the time, I want power runners at at least 217#.