Been pancaked by David … my first impression.
My second impression … sometimes you should take a step back to jump two or three steps further.

Best point, there is still a free option to play in order "pay to play" character is eliminated.
—————— + —————— + —————— + ——————
Most of us love to compete with others real human owners and not AI / bot teams.
I would cut all my leagues to play a new league as 1-team owner.
(Easy decision which teams I have to cut … all.)

Who is willing to take part in a newly founded league with allocation draft from scratch ?
Who wants to be admin in a customizing league (free logos/colors/names/so on) with gameplaning ?

We can organize a list of 1-TEAM and MULTI-TEAM owners to ensure the continued existence of MFN.
So who wants to be league admin and who is joining ?

I would join as 1-team owner.

Good idea.
I'd need to give my current league a bit of time to see where it lands, but I'm down to be a 1 team owner in a new league should my current one fold.

At the moment I start cutting.
It's so bitter, there are some real good project teams in my portfolio and fruits are growing.

But on the other way I don't like to play against AI teams.
It´s a pity to see leagues shrinking but maybe only way to survive.

We now have two openings in B1G vs SEC. I understand the new subscription model is a big change and if you need to drop to one league starting out with a new team in a new league seems to be one way to go. I think we will have several new leagues popping up as older leagues will fold as owners make their choices as to which league they wish to keep playing in.

I’m now stuck with two leagues I can’t run unless I upgrade to the (cheaper) annual price of $8:73 per month .
So being a league owner , you get penalised for running the **** show?
Sounds fair to me ffs

Quick look today:

in all leagues there are "Available Teams".