So in MFN65 my team went to the Conference Championship Game, thus making me a Divisional Championship winner. Would there be away to award 2 Divisional Championship winners? Right now it has the Division Leaders as Division Champions; where as they didn't win the Division Championship game. Obviously the other 2 wouldn't need Divisional Champs because they would be the Conference Champs. I say this because I finished 12-4 behind Arizona and went on to the Conference Championship from the wild cards, yet received no recognition.
Next possibly add a like button to some of these comments? I know this isn't facebook, but I believe for some hitting a like button will give you a better analysis of what people are viewing and like.
Re: Divisional Leader vs. Divisional Champion
by
jsid
@
4/26/2016 12:40 pm
Winning the Division is a regular season accolade. You took 2nd in your division in 2016. Unfortunately, winning the divisional round (which is a misleading name imo) doesn't put anything in your trophy case. You have to win the division in the regular season for the Division Champ trophy.
Edit - I misunderstood this as a question. Sorry.
Last edited 4/26/2016 6:03 pm
Re: Divisional Leader vs. Divisional Champion
by
dei1c3
@
4/26/2016 12:58 pm
-1
That sounds a lot like the "AFC Championship Finalists" banner the Colts put up a year or so ago. You can't have a banner for everything.
Re: Divisional Leader vs. Divisional Champion
by
Mawxy
@
4/26/2016 2:13 pm
dei1c3 wrote:
-1
That sounds a lot like the "AFC Championship Finalists" banner the Colts put up a year or so ago. You can't have a banner for everything.
+1 on this
Re: Divisional Leader vs. Divisional Champion
by
DLegend
@
4/26/2016 5:16 pm
After doing a little research, I see it's just the Divisional round. Oh well thanks for the comments. I guess I am aiming at taking down Arizona this year! Good bye little birds.