Cst9 Draft
by
parsh
@
10/01/2016 5:17 pm
Thought I would make mention that the AI controlled team (Milwaukee) through 4 rounds has drafted 4 QBs.
|
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
eyeballll
@
10/02/2016 12:31 pm
Maybe he's planning on turning them into OL's...
|
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
WarEagle
@
10/02/2016 2:22 pm
Let's just say I'm not worried about The Matrix or The Terminator becoming reality any time soon.
|
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
punisher
@
10/02/2016 2:56 pm
parsh wrote: Thought I would make mention that the AI controlled team (Milwaukee) through 4 rounds has drafted 4 QBs. Milwaukee = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/team/view/14 what gets me is they didnt need to draft those 4 because they have 4 QBS before they drafted those 4. |
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
raymattison21
@
10/02/2016 4:42 pm
punisher wrote: parsh wrote: Thought I would make mention that the AI controlled team (Milwaukee) through 4 rounds has drafted 4 QBs. Milwaukee = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/team/view/14 what gets me is they didnt need to draft those 4 because they have 4 QBS before they drafted those 4. They need two of those, and if one other hits, I would take him over QB Preston. The team did well last year. What they really needed is a QB. Alot of depth too, but by the fourth QB taken you could safely say this is a bug. But running them last season i think those first three picks will give them a better shot in the future. Still, i probaly would have drafted different players anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
punisher
@
10/02/2016 4:54 pm
raymattison21 wrote: punisher wrote: parsh wrote: Thought I would make mention that the AI controlled team (Milwaukee) through 4 rounds has drafted 4 QBs. Milwaukee = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/team/view/14 what gets me is they didnt need to draft those 4 because they have 4 QBS before they drafted those 4. They need two of those, and if one other hits, I would take him over QB Preston. The team did well last year. What they really needed is a QB. Alot of depth too, but by the fourth QB taken you could safely say this is a bug. But running them last season i think those first three picks will give them a better shot in the future. Still, i probaly would have drafted different players anyway. still it would have been better for them to get a LG , a LT and a FS because they have only 1 of each. Then when you add on top of that they have 17 players who are 10 years or longer playing you would think the computer would sign players and draft players where most likely a player is going to retire so they are not screwed. anyway what worries me though is if that team drafts all 7 QBS for their draft picks because 1 league a player only drafted RBS and QBS and that league crashed. That league was League 69 and that team was Arizona. that user who did that was Isenru anyway Roll tide took that team over and finished 0-16 in 2016 Fort Franklin took that team over in 2017 and finished 3-13. |
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
parsh
@
10/03/2016 4:09 pm
ALSO .. San Jose has taken 6 TEs through 6 rounds ...
|
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
punisher
@
10/03/2016 4:24 pm
parsh wrote: ALSO .. San Jose has taken 6 TEs through 6 rounds ... San Jose is also computer controlled = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/team/view/28 Update: Milwaukee has drafted a Center and a MLB for 5th and 6th draft picks |
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
punisher
@
10/03/2016 4:30 pm
Here is Milwaukee's 6 picks
1:23 QB = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6166 2:22 QB = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6142 3:23 QB = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/5815 4:22 QB = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6059 5:23 MLB = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6162 6:22 Center = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6045 Here is San Jose's 6 TES' for their 6 draft picks 1:13 TE = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6183 2:12 TE = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/5889 3:13 TE = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/5980 4:12 TE = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/6091 5:13 TE = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/5829 6:12 TE = https://cust9.myfootballnow.com/player/5832 |
|
Re: Cst9 Draft
by
parsh
@
10/03/2016 6:35 pm
parsh wrote: ALSO .. San Jose has taken 6 TEs through 6 rounds ... 7 for 7!! |
|