Re: Interesting Dilemma I'm In; need clarity on a subject
by
punisher
@
5/31/2017 3:02 pm
WarEagle wrote: Yes. really cant fault you for doing that. you have 1 speedster at RB and 2 slow pokes at RB speedster Jack Nickel = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/9886 btw he is injured for 7 weeks slow poke 1 George Murray = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/10030 slow poke 2 Robert Litchfield = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/11698 that CB David Huggard = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/12009 if you werent playing him at RB and went with those 2 slow pokes you really wouldnt have a running game to worry about and people could probably just key on your passing game then basically beat you But having that CB playing so good at RB actually gives your opponent something to worry about where if they just key on your passing game they could get hurt big time |
|
Re: Interesting Dilemma I'm In; need clarity on a subject
by
Animal7
@
5/31/2017 10:39 pm
Thanks guys for all of the help. I appreciate it. I hope my punter and kicker survive the game especially the punter, who will have a bunch of young guys blocking for him as well as an inexperienced long snapper. They badly need the work.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Interesting Dilemma I'm In; need clarity on a subject
by
raymattison21
@
6/02/2017 9:52 am
WarEagle wrote: parsh wrote: Tackles as QBs .. LBs as RBs .. DTs as WRs .. That's tanking .. On a related (and unrelated) note, as an experiment prompted by some injuries I put a CB in my RB depth chart in MFN-1. He is averaging 7.1 ypc on 50 attempts, but he also has 6 fumbles. Rushing is as broke as the kick return game . |
|
Re: Interesting Dilemma I'm In; need clarity on a subject
by
Animal7
@
6/02/2017 5:50 pm
For those that were wondering, I lost my game 27-10 and that clinched me the 1st pick in next year's draft. Quite a few of my players did improve because they played so that turned out profitable.
|
|