It would be great if the information on the formations/plays called used on offense and defense scouting related to down and distance. As things now stand, all we know is the frequency with which some formations and plays are called in the aggregate. To truly plan, it would be helpful to know, for example, whether an opponent often gambles on 1st and 10 with going long (and in what formation) or plays it safe. The only way to derive that information now is to personally chart the plays called by your opponent previously under certain conditions.
It would be great if the information on the formations/plays called used on offense and defense scouting related to down and distance. As things now stand, all we know is the frequency with which some formations and plays are called in the aggregate. To truly plan, it would be helpful to know, for example, whether an opponent often gambles on 1st and 10 with going long (and in what formation) or plays it safe. The only way to derive that information now is to personally chart the plays called by your opponent previously under certain conditions.
+1
Re: Deeper Scouting Statistics
by
jgcruz
@
10/10/2016 1:10 pm
I didn't think anybody was paying attention. Thanks, Eagle.
The #1 item on my wish list is better scouting/gameplanning tools, followed closely by the ability to run true hurry-up/slow-down offenses and to be able to sub players via rules (not just pull starters, but put them back in also).
