There should be co-admins so if the admin steps down or is not on for a period of time can accept pending team owners or veto trades but they can't appoint other co admins only the admin can. there should be 1-3 co admins and the admin picks a pecking order for the co-admins. #1 has most responsible and #2 has less and #3 has the least. It is probably a bad idea I just figured it would save JBD a lot of time if one steps down.

~MasonBronos

doesnt hurt to suggest this.

it is a good idea in my opinion


Edit:
btw i would think with 25 views this idea would get more likes than just 2 and considering people have to go to JDB to ask to be a admin of a abandoned league you would think people would make this idea the most likely idea in suggestion area on historic levels yet i guess thats what i get for thinking.

I think this has been brought up before and I like the idea with certain restriction.

I like the idea of the it being a choice but would be highly against it if it were mandatory.
I wouldn't want a league being locked down if there is not a co-admin assigned or a random person auto-assigned. Ya gotta really trust who your allowing to help run your league.

Also to go along with your pecking order, having the league owner be able to assign different admin privileges would be necessary. Such as team ownership approval, trade rejection, forums, GM removal, changing league titles and settings to name a few. The pecking order can be used if the league owner quits MFN for whatever reason.

Although this all sounds good for us playing the game, it might be tough to do on the programming side of things idk. That's for others to chime in that are way smarter than me.

I want to see if this idea was even considered, because it seems like alot of leagues are dieing and this would be awesome for them