Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Re: Opponent Declines Penalty that would have Negated Turnover
by
Kababmaster
@
12/09/2018 10:21 pm
"3-10-NED 37 (10:41) 6-Robert Ford pass INTERCEPTED by 41-Daniel Bueno at NED 22. 41-Daniel Bueno to NED 33 for 11 yards. Tackle by 6-Robert Ford. PENALTY - Defensive Holding (NED 41-Daniel Bueno) (Declined)"
Best guess is that the Penalty came after the interception ?...and the AI called it as holding on the return team ?
Last edited 12/10/2018 4:22 am
Re: Opponent Declines Penalty that would have Negated Turnover
by
setherick
@
12/09/2018 10:22 pm
Why would you decline ANY penalty in that situation?
Re: Opponent Declines Penalty that would have Negated Turnover
by
Kababmaster
@
12/09/2018 10:24 pm
setherick wrote:
Why would you decline ANY penalty in that situation?
The penalty would be enforced -10 yards from the spot of the foul. I'm not sure why it would be declined.
Last edited 12/10/2018 4:25 am
Re: Opponent Declines Penalty that would have Negated Turnover
by
Kababmaster
@
12/09/2018 10:30 pm
It does look weird, to add, the player who Intercepted the pass is the same guy that is charged with the hold. I have never seen a ball carrier charged with a holding call LOL
Re: Opponent Declines Penalty that would have Negated Turnover
by
setherick
@
12/09/2018 10:38 pm
Kababmaster wrote:
It does look weird, to add, the player who Intercepted the pass is the same guy that is charged with the hold. I have never seen a ball carrier charged with a holding call LOL
That's why I think the hold happened before the interception, but the play by play displayed the order in reverse.
