http://mfn8.myfootballnow.com/watch/902#172432

My starting LT made that tackle, which begs the question... what the heck was he doing playing defense? Sure, my d-line is banged up from injuries, but there's still 6 active and plenty of LBs to choose from if need be. The logic on subbing needs a little tweaking, I think, or some way to indicate that certain players may never be utilized outside their depth chart rankings (or somehow otherwise deprioritize them). After watching my 85 rated RT give up 2 sacks and multiple holds versus a 48 rated DE, I really can't afford having my o-linemen expend any of their energy elsewhere, haha.

+1 I had LT and C's playing both receivers and defensive linemen in a preseason game, even though I have 3 players at both positions. and I surely had enough receivers 6 or 7 of them were active.

Same here. Linemen running the ball while running backs are playing on defense, along with many other out of position play occurring.

+1000,000

Wait until you have an out of position player pick up a really bad injury, needless.

http://cust9.myfootballnow.com/watch/804#169691

My starting FB made a sick sack last game.

Not for the first time my LT is playing WR, this time got a TD, a winning one - http://cust12.myfootballnow.com/watch/446#89606.
He has never ever been listed as a WR or TE so am puzzled as to why this should happen.
5 WRs dressed for this game, so its not like there wasn't enough depth or they were gassed.

I'll definitely make this a priority to figure out why that's happening.

Looks like he was lined up as a TE.

hope he reported as eligible then ;)

offensive lineman are very good receivers for me in the preseason, and i dont have them listed at WR. Maybe you should switch receivers over to off. lineman and off. lineman to WR ;)