I have been away from the game for a bit. Just did a full draft for a new league. Training camp resulted in every player getting a - negative in the overall scores. Is this the new normal?

I see a pretty well rounded amount of players who either went up or stayed the same compared to the ones who went down. Close to 50/50 as coded. I played for over five years and the only thing that has fluctuated in that time is the amount of overall talent in drafts.

thanks for the response I did not have any players that went up and that is out of a 57 man team from a brand new draft in a brand new league....

When you say all players, are you including all these?

Have you editted your player weights as this looks like you knocked it out the park at TC

#34 David Peralta CB R
12/9
12/9
41
78
#52 Michael Lawson WLB R
14/7
14/7
35
66
#39 Paul Anderson FB 3
3/5
3/5
42
78
#76 Randy Brown LG R
16/5
16/5
50
76
#93 Courtney Jones MLB R
8/5
8/5
37
75
#95 Clifford Rameriz WLB 2
9/5
9/5
36
76
#33 Hector Lear RB R
14/4
14/4
53
90
#86 Mathew Su WR R
9/4
9/4
47
78
#18 Mike Currin WR R
9/4
9/4
42
72
#14 Ervin Bridges WR R
11/3
11/3
50
75
#85 Zachary Scott WR 3
5/3
5/3
52
72
#72 Donald Turner LDE 4
5/3
5/3
60
78
#96 Oscar Johnston MLB R
17/3
17/3
46
72
#83 David Biondi TE 5
3/2
3/2
63
69
#73 John Mendez RG R
4/2
4/2
38
72
#20 Maurice Burley RB 3
2/1
2/1
44
60
#68 Mark Wall LT 3
1/1
1/1
70
84
#54 Vernon Sander LG 2
0/1
0/1
34
64
#63 Robert Jackson C 4
0/1
0/1
54
67
#50 Russell Miller SLB 5
1/1
1/1
39
72
#45 Craig Dellinger CB 3
6/1
6/1
57
75
#47 Harry Jackson FS 5
2/1
2/1
66
77
#48 Christopher Savory FS 3
6/1
6/1
45
54
#8 Danny Parkhill QB 3
5/0
5/0
54
65
#84 Tony Jackson TE 7
0/0
0/0
59
59
#2 Paul Angel P 4
1/0
1/0
72
80
#5 Randy Humphrey K 10
0/0
0/0
76
76
#53 Jason Roberts LDE 5
2/0
2/0
46
57
#90 Morton Flynn DT R
15/0
15/0
42
64
#94 Terry Alejandro WLB 2
5/0
5/0
37
61
#23 Ken Hartnett CB 3
7/0
7/0
55
94
#36 Joe Lauterbach CB R
13/0
13/0
51
95
#26 Timothy Lesure SS 7
0/0
0/0
81
81
#44 Sean Brooks SS 3
2/0
2/0
42
60

Were seeing something different. perhaps it is a display thing ....that was the team i had checked. Do you mean the red or blue bars ? maybe the numerical part of the red bar stayed the same?

Husky had 22 players boom +1 or better...15 break even and 23 bust -1 or worse....by my weights seems normal for allocation draft.

The majority -1/0/+1 with a few booms and bust