I've been seeing too many instances of crying about trades lately, as in people want trades voided because they feel one side either paid too much or didn't pay enough.
Seems there are 2 schools of thought...one side feels trades shouldn't be unbalanced while others say let trades go as long as there is no collusion or a new owner getting taken advantage of.
I get the side of not wanting unbalanced trades. It's not enjoyable seeing a rival team get such a sweet deal for such a small price, but is that enough to void a trade?
If two owners who have been around awhile agree to a deal between themselves and that trade doesn't break any existing league rules, why ask to have it voided?
Are we gonna have to go fantasy league style and have trade votes?
If we want to use real world examples, the NFL did not void the Herschel Walker trade or the Ricky Williams trade when Ditka traded all his picks to move up.
