People who liked this post

  • Community
  • Log In
Another awful pick by the AI
Bug Box
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ›
WarEagle
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by WarEagle @ 8/23/2016 12:10 pm
Gustoon wrote:
On the plus side, he has ZERO in volatility, what you see is what you get ;)

I would rather have Mark Gastineau. At least that pick seemed to make sense at the time.
Gustoon
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by Gustoon @ 8/23/2016 12:17 pm
WarEagle wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
On the plus side, he has ZERO in volatility, what you see is what you get ;)

I would rather have Mark Gastineau. At least that pick seemed to make sense at the time.

What now? :0
MistbornJedi
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by MistbornJedi @ 8/23/2016 12:50 pm
If you want what he has...I want you in my division!
WarEagle
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by WarEagle @ 8/24/2016 11:36 am
Another sad situation:

CUST-64.
With the 1.2 and 2.3 picks in the draft, Houston selects 2 PUNTERS (this first of which isn't even any good, but he does have a volatility rating of 4!).

This one is partially the owner's fault because it is not an AI controlled team.

However, I would guess the owner did not make any adjustments to the default AI generated draft board, which is why the 2 punters were taken.

Unless a human has actually placed a Punter or Kicker in the center "Manual Priority List", the AI should NEVER draft one of these positions before the 6th round, if at all.
punisher
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by punisher @ 8/24/2016 12:21 pm
WarEagle wrote:
Another sad situation:

CUST-64.
With the 1.2 and 2.3 picks in the draft, Houston selects 2 PUNTERS (this first of which isn't even any good, but he does have a volatility rating of 4!).

This one is partially the owner's fault because it is not an AI controlled team.

However, I would guess the owner did not make any adjustments to the default AI generated draft board, which is why the 2 punters were taken.

Unless a human has actually placed a Punter or Kicker in the center "Manual Priority List", the AI should NEVER draft one of these positions before the 6th round, if at all.

actually it is Houston's owner fault .
they haven't logged in since 8-17-2016
Houston = https://cust64.myfootballnow.com/team/view/14
Mr.Krazy
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by Mr.Krazy @ 8/24/2016 9:12 pm
Its not his fault for making the pick though, its the AI's fault for making the pick for him since he hasn't logged in to set his manual priority list.

Unless if he logged in on week 1 of early free agency and is looking to tank his team and ended up placing two punters in the manual priority list, it is all the AI's fault.

AI is not being very draft friendly lately..
Liked by WarEagle, Bryson10
punisher
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by punisher @ 8/26/2016 9:51 am
I am going to guess this pick is a awful one

RT = https://mfn24.myfootballnow.com/player/6220

Reason this is a awful one is LA already has 2 RT's

LA = https://mfn24.myfootballnow.com/team/view/22

I say the reason that happened is that owner hasn't logged in since 8-8-2016 which if they don't log in on 8-28-2016 it will been 20 Days since they logged in.
WarEagle
Re: Another awful pick by the AI
by WarEagle @ 8/26/2016 10:09 am
punisher wrote:
I am going to guess this pick is a awful one

RT = https://mfn24.myfootballnow.com/player/6220

Reason this is a awful one is LA already has 2 RT's

LA = https://mfn24.myfootballnow.com/team/view/22

I say the reason that happened is that owner hasn't logged in since 8-8-2016 which if they don't log in on 8-28-2016 it will been 20 Days since they logged in.

That's a good pick.
Liked by Mr.Krazy, parsh
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Website Version 60d139e
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy