I also like the idea of making only significantly out of balance trades up for review and have the traders give their rational at the trade submission for why the trade should go through. I think when a significantly out of balance trade occurs, a notification of the trade should be sent out, with the option to vote to overturn it if the reasons given for the trade are not good enough. I think both these together will cut down on trades that are suspicious or trades where people are taking advantage of another persons ignorance of the game.

I still dont like the idea of being able to make certain trades because of seniority in the league, Everyone should still be on the same even playing field and new owners shouldnt be restricted. Actually for the most part those are probably the owners that need to make the trades the most

I agree. I think everyone should be on the same playing field.

Also, I like to have the option of trading a pick 5 years in the future as it is now.

I may be willing to give up a 1st in 2019 that I wouldn't for 2015 becuase in I know that in 2019 it will be the last pick of the round (so not worth very much), because I'm the 3 time defending champ due to the great player I got by trading that pick back in 2015!

... because I'm the 3 time defending champ due to the great player I got by trading that pick back in 2015!

Alright, Let's keep it simple if we can.

No new limits.

Revamp the trade weight bar so it is functional.

If any trade falls outside the guidelines a warning prompt will recommend posting your reasoning and that a anonymous veto vote will be automatically started that could overturn the trade.