Quarterbacks
by
Mitch4742
@
11/21/2019 1:06 pm
Why is every league the top QB attributes are never very impressive. I realize there are a lot of variables but it seems like a qb with an 80 ranking is what ya want..lol
|
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
TheAdmiral
@
11/21/2019 3:12 pm
Player weightings has an effect, for instance a QB has about 10/12 different variables you consider, whereas a Tackle or Guard has 5. Therefore it's more likely to see a 90+ rated O lineman than an 80+ rated QB.
|
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
setherick
@
11/22/2019 9:40 pm
Mitch4742 wrote: Why is every league the top QB attributes are never very impressive. I realize there are a lot of variables but it seems like a qb with an 80 ranking is what ya want..lol Default QB ratings are awful because they are still based on 0.3.x code or earlier. Here's what matters for QBs Intelligence: Dictates which person the QB throws at Accuracy: How close to the ideal spot for the ball the QB throws it Arm Strength: Velocity to get the ball there and beat the defender Release: The time between when the QB choose the target and throws Field of Vision: How much of the field the QB sees (100 = 170 degrees of vision) Scramble: How accurate the QB throws on the run Look Off: (Least important of these) How easily the QB moves the safety (and as far as I know, only the safety) Basically, you want a QB with these minimums: IN = 90+ ACC = 75+ (< 50 is unplayable) ARM = 75+ FOV = 60+ REL = 60+ For ACC and ARM, you can get by with 60+ if the QB has great other attributes and your play calling is fundamental. This rookie in 2 took me a long ways for being a 6th round pick, and he has ~65 in everything except IN and FOV: https://mfn2.myfootballnow.com/player/13016 |
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
raidergreg69
@
11/23/2019 3:59 am
What Seth said is generally true but I've won championships with a stupid QB in USFL.
https://usflwfl.myfootballnow.com/player/1443 ![]() Full disclosure, those teams relied on defense and the running game, and Labelle is likely an exception to the rule. |
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
Mitch4742
@
11/23/2019 6:18 am
Thanks!! Super helpful
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
Mitch4742
@
11/23/2019 6:27 am
I've seen QBS with attributes like that w/ winning teams quite a bit. That's what I was talking about...I realize the variables. But that minimum chart definitely helped!
|
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
Lamba
@
11/23/2019 8:22 am
I've somehow won two championships with my current RB... Or despite him.
But he was a FA pickup who kept improving in accuracy and I haven't had high picks, so... |
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
setherick
@
11/23/2019 8:53 am
Lamba wrote: I've somehow won two championships with my current RB... Or despite him. But he was a FA pickup who kept improving in accuracy and I haven't had high picks, so... What are you talking about. Flowers looks awesome. 95+ IN, ACC, ARM |
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
Mitch4742
@
11/23/2019 8:57 am
Wow, that was an awesome pick up for free agent. And not having to have him on hook for a big chunk of salary either.
|
|
Re: Quarterbacks
by
raymattison21
@
11/23/2019 12:02 pm
setherick wrote: Lamba wrote: I've somehow won two championships with my current RB... Or despite him. But he was a FA pickup who kept improving in accuracy and I haven't had high picks, so... What are you talking about. Flowers looks awesome. 95+ IN, ACC, ARM I like those three ratings. This guy makes mistakes , 6 interceptions in the play offs, and his accuracy is developing but he is a serviceable option |
|
