Re: QBs don't need Accuracy
by
Gustoon
@
2/25/2017 4:18 pm
setherick wrote: This just in: 28 accuracy QB (he's improved) throws 9 TDs in 100 point blow out win: https://cust78.myfootballnow.com/box/view/233 Through 11 games, he still doesn't complete 50%, but his TD:INT ratio is 40:14. I bet all y'all with 100 accuracy QBs would love that ratio. (I know I would.) QB should be the most important piece in the teams jigsaw, and they're not really relevant at all, no one knows exactly what DNA makes a good QB here |
|
Re: QBs don't need Accuracy
by
WarEagle
@
2/25/2017 4:23 pm
Gustoon wrote: QB should be the most important piece in the teams jigsaw, and they're not really relevant at all, no one knows exactly what DNA makes a good QB here I don't think there is such as thing as a "good QB" in MFN. They are basically all the same when you watch a game. The only difference is the random combination of "dice rolls" on each play, which can make a poorly rated QB perform better than a highly rated QB, and vice versa. In short, it's mostly just randomness like everything else (except blitzing the **** out of your opponent to shut down the running game - that works without fail). |
|
|
|
|
Re: QBs don't need Accuracy
by
Jake-Attack03
@
2/25/2017 4:29 pm
This should be tweaked with, to make the QB's outcome, or result, less random; and more based on his Abilities and ratings.
|
|
Re: QBs don't need Accuracy
by
parsh
@
2/25/2017 4:41 pm
parsh wrote: Back on point .. I agree with the OP: 4 games in .. 44 Accuracy: (9 games in) .. still 44 Accuracy: Att 179 (341) Comp 95 (177) Pct 53.1 (51.9) Yds 1,537 (2961) Yds/Att 8.59 (8.68) Sk/Yd 14/101 (32/228) TDs 12 (22) Int 3 (8) Lng 80 (88) Rat 97.45 (93.25) https://cust10.myfootballnow.com/player/4836 (Currently at midweek 10) added to my post .. and still agree with the OP .. lol |
|