People who liked this post

  • Community
  • Log In
Announcing Version 0.4.3!
General MFN Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • ›
punisher
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by punisher @ 7/12/2018 11:11 am
-----------------------
Last edited 7/22/2018 8:59 pm
punisher
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by punisher @ 7/16/2018 11:44 am
------------------
Last edited 7/22/2018 8:59 pm
punisher
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by punisher @ 7/18/2018 1:09 pm
---------------
Last edited 7/22/2018 8:59 pm
punisher
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by punisher @ 7/19/2018 8:56 am
-----------------
Last edited 7/22/2018 9:00 pm
punisher
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by punisher @ 7/21/2018 9:43 pm
-------------------
Last edited 7/22/2018 9:00 pm
Mr.Krazy
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by Mr.Krazy @ 7/22/2018 3:08 pm
Punisher, could you please announce league openings in the league matchmaking forums and stop spamming this forum with leagues that are going into the 0.4.3 engine?

Thanks
Liked by DJSim22, mikecouil, tribewriterand 1 others
punisher
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by punisher @ 7/22/2018 4:02 pm
Let me first off i really thought i was doing a service here to tell about each league that was going into the new version

and probably i should have posted it in the league matchmaking instead of here so to everyone i am sorry


here is where i will post from now on = https://mfn19.myfootballnow.com/community/2/4725?page=1#29041
Liked by mikecouil, jgcruz
setherick
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by setherick @ 7/23/2018 11:15 am
Need clarification on this.

* Bump and run coverage has been improved where the DB will now run with the WR and interrupt the pattern

Is this accurate? In testing, at least before April 1, it was M2M that allowed DBs to run with WRs and interrupt patterns. When did this change?

This explains why so many long routes are suddenly open all of the time since most DBs have crappy B&R and fall down as soon as they are beat. ...

If this description is correct, then M2M is a worthless attribute since B&R will now control downfield coverage and short coverage and getting beat off the snap and ... you get it. Dumb.

---

If you're saying that failed B&R will now cause the DB to turn and run with the WR, then it's just false because that does not appear to be happening at all.
Last edited 7/23/2018 4:21 pm
Liked by mikecouil
jgcruz
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by jgcruz @ 7/23/2018 11:25 am
setherick wrote:
Need clarification on this.

* Bump and run coverage has been improved where the DB will now run with the WR and interrupt the pattern

Is this accurate? In testing, at least before April 1, it was M2M that allowed DBs to run with WRs and interrupt patterns. When did this change?

This explains why so many long routes are suddenly open all of the time since most DBs have crappy B&R and fall down as soon as they are beat. ...

If this description is correct, then M2M is a worthless attribute since B&R will now control downfield coverage and short coverage and getting beat off the snap and ... you get it. Dumb.

---

If you're saying that failed B&R will now cause the DB to turn and run with the WR, then it's just false because that does not appear to be happening at all.

Is there any way to dictate or anticipate when DBs will use B&R?
setherick
Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!
by setherick @ 7/23/2018 11:32 am
jgcruz wrote:
setherick wrote:
Need clarification on this.

* Bump and run coverage has been improved where the DB will now run with the WR and interrupt the pattern

Is this accurate? In testing, at least before April 1, it was M2M that allowed DBs to run with WRs and interrupt patterns. When did this change?

This explains why so many long routes are suddenly open all of the time since most DBs have crappy B&R and fall down as soon as they are beat. ...

If this description is correct, then M2M is a worthless attribute since B&R will now control downfield coverage and short coverage and getting beat off the snap and ... you get it. Dumb.

---

If you're saying that failed B&R will now cause the DB to turn and run with the WR, then it's just false because that does not appear to be happening at all.

Is there any way to dictate or anticipate when DBs will use B&R?

No. I'm complaining about that in a separate thread: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/forums/6/1444?page=1&x=nOkHGdGMd3#9982
Liked by mikecouil
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Website Version ec41690
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy